Skip to main content
· 6/28/1995

Dean Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc.

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 1238
  • 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2732
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15900
  • 1995 WL 385841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where party opposing removal had been ordered to amend its complaint to assert a federal claim, in order to avoid creating a Hobson's choice the court did not deem the question of removal jurisdiction to have been rendered moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Fagg, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.