Skip to main content
· 12/16/2004

Derrick E. Harper v. Autoalliance International, Inc., Aai Employee Services Co., L.L.C., Jeffrey Kelly, and Allen Childress

Citations

  • 392 F.3d 195
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 542
  • 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2266
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26258
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1748
  • 2004 WL 2901110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if initial timely consent was ineffective, co-defendant cured “any purported defect” by opposing the motion to remand
  • holding that claims are part of the same case or controversy if they derive from a “common nucleus of operative facts”
  • holding that claims are part of the same case or controversy if they derive from a “common nucleus of operative facts”
  • holding that claims are part of the same case or controversy if they derive from a “common nucleus of operative facts”
  • holding that claims are part of the same case or controversy if they derive from a “common nucleus of operative facts”
  • holding that claims are part of the same case or controversy if they derive from a “common nucleus of operative facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Clay, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.