Third Circuit· 6/11/2002

De Leon-Reynoso v. Ashcroft

Citations

293 F.3d 633
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the rationales need not “command enthusiasm,” as along as “they form a plausible justification for the distinction”
stating that Congress only needed to have “conceivably had good reasons to create ... the distinction”
rejecting defend- ant’s argument that Pennsylvania Superior Court cases “injected an objec- tive element into the Pennsylvania statute”
“Courts have held that knowingly receiving stolen property is a crime of moral turpitude.”
“[K]nowingly possessing stolen goods is a crime of moral turpitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.