De Leon-Reynoso v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the rationales need not “command enthusiasm,” as along as “they form a plausible justification for the distinction”
• stating that Congress only needed to have “conceivably had good reasons to create ... the distinction”
• rejecting defend- ant’s argument that Pennsylvania Superior Court cases “injected an objec- tive element into the Pennsylvania statute”
• “Courts have held that knowingly receiving stolen property is a crime of moral turpitude.”
• “[K]nowingly possessing stolen goods is a crime of moral turpitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).