An Na Peng v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the facially legitimate standard where an alien brought an equal protection challenge to a statute imposing a continuous-presence requirement on lawful permanent residents (LPRs) but not on non-LPRs
• applying the Mandel standard to reject a lawful permanent resident’s equal protection challenge against a broad policy
• requiring consideration of the “nature of the evidence excluded as a result of the denial of the continuance”
• the BIA abuses its discretion when it fails to consider all relevant factors bearing on the balance of equities or an application for relief
• “The regulations do not define good cause, but the IJ—and, on appeal, the BIA—should consider factors including (1) the nature of the evidence excluded as a result of the denial of the continuance, (2) the reasonableness of the immigrant’s conduct, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).