Wieslaw Lukowski v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government breached the plea agreement by failing to expressly request that defendant be sentenced at the low end of the guidelines range, as agreed in the parties’ Rule 11(c)(1)(B) agreement
• assuming that the court had statutory jurisdiction to decide a claim and explaining that statutory jurisdiction was “not the type of jurisdictional issue that must be decided before addressing the merits of the controversy”
• noting that “our judicial review is limited to the administrative record”
• holding a similar equal protection argument lacks merit
• “judicial review is limited to the administrative record”
• “judicial review is limited to the administrative record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).