Nevada Supreme Court· 8/16/1996

Day v. Zubel

Citations

922 P.2d 536
112 Nev. 972
1996 Nev. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the statute of limitations for tort and civil rights claims commences upon the dismissal of criminal charges with prejudice
noting that determining the date when the statute of limitations began to run is a question of law if the facts are uncontroverted
stating that \[Ole appropriate accrual date for the statute of limitations is a question of law only if the facts are uncontroverted\
\The appropriate accrual date for the statute of limitations is a question of law only if the facts are uncontroverted.\
statute of limitations period on plaintiff's federal civil rights cause of action based on public defender's representation during criminal proceeding did not begin until plaintiff's criminal proceedings terminated
a legal 16 malpractice claim requires both the existence of an attorney-client relationship and a showing that 17 the attorney caused the harm to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Springer, Steffen, Young, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.