Clark v. Robison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “ ‘no relief–no 20 harm’ approach” was specifically adopted because “proximate cause does not exist until post- 21 conviction or appellate relief is granted”
• applying the litigation malpractice tolling rule to the entirety of NRS 11.207, including the discovery rule language
• providing, with respect to the entirety of the older version of NRS 11.207(1
• once relief from conviction granted, statute of limitations for legal malpractice claim begins to run
• once relief from conviction is granted, criminal malpractice claim may be brought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).