· 7/17/2002
Fink v. Oshins
Citations
- 49 P.3d 640
- 118 Nev. 428
- 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 45
- 2002 Nev. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that the recipient of the communication be either directly involved or significantly interested in the proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shearing, Rose and Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.