· 11/22/2004
Mainor v. Nault
Citations
- 101 P.3d 308
- 120 Nev. 750
- 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 84
- 2004 Nev. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that an erroneous jury instruction is reviewed \for prejudicial error in light of the evidence\
- providing that an erroneous jury instruction is reviewed “for prejudicial error in light of the evidence”
- noting that “[a]t least one jurisdiction has held that a violation of a professional rule creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence,” in reference to the Hart case
- noting that “[a]t least one jurisdiction has held that a violation of a professional rule creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence,” in reference to the Hart case
- noting that “[a]t least one jurisdiction has held that a violation of a professional rule creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence,” in reference to the Hart case
- noting that “[a]t least one jurisdiction has held that a violation of a professional rule creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence,” in reference to the Hart case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.