Skip to main content
· 3/25/2004

Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.

Citations

  • 86 P.3d 678
  • 336 Or. 511
  • 2004 Ore. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the defendant could not invoke judicial estoppel where the “record [was] devoid of any indication that an administrative or judicial tribunal made a final determination regarding plaintiff’s status as a subject worker at the time of his injury”
  • concluding the defendant could not invoke judicial estoppel where the “record [was] devoid of any indication that an administrative or judicial tri- bunal made a final determination regarding plaintiff’s status as a subject worker at the time of his injury”
  • stating elements of equitable estoppel
  • stating elements of equitable estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.