· 3/25/2004
Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.
Citations
- 86 P.3d 678
- 336 Or. 511
- 2004 Ore. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the defendant could not invoke judicial estoppel where the “record [was] devoid of any indication that an administrative or judicial tribunal made a final determination regarding plaintiff’s status as a subject worker at the time of his injury”
- concluding the defendant could not invoke judicial estoppel where the “record [was] devoid of any indication that an administrative or judicial tri- bunal made a final determination regarding plaintiff’s status as a subject worker at the time of his injury”
- stating elements of equitable estoppel
- stating elements of equitable estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.