Bennett v. CITY OF SALEM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply estoppel when statements were “mere expressions of opinion”
• “the water master is charged with the duty of preventing wastage of water”
• “the water master is charged with the duty of preventing wastage of water”
• “Unquestionably, an appropriator of water is not entitled to unreasonably waste it. What he appropriates must be devoted to a beneficial use, and he is never entitled to divert more water than is actually put to such use, reasonable transmission losses excepted.”
• “Unquestionably, an appropriator of water is not entitled to unreasonably waste it. What he appropriates must be devoted to a beneficial use, and he is never entitled to divert more water than is actually put to such use, reasonable transmission losses excepted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).