Rubalcaba v. Nagaki Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Oregon Supreme Court has found employee status despite “mixed” evidence of control
• workers’ compensation laws require court to consider “nature of work” test and “right of control” test
• workers' compensation laws require court to consider \nature of work\ test and \right of control\ test
• agency determination whether subject of applicable legal standard qualifies under that standard is conclusion of law, not finding of fact
• determination of claimant’s status as “worker” is conclusion of law, not finding of fact
• “[I]n situations in which there is some evidence suggesting that an employer retained the right to control the method and details of a claimant’s work, a conclusion about the claimant’s status depends on the analytical factors relevant to both tests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).