Skip to main content

Dawson v. State

Citations

  • 786 N.E.2d 742
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 630
  • 2003 WL 1884218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “once an individual crushes up pills in order to separate the ephedrine from the pill binders, the manufacturing process has begun” and evidence of such is sufficient to support a conviction for dealing in methamphetamine by knowingly manufacturing it
  • “The denial of a motion to suppress in and of itself is insufficient to preserve error for appeal.”
  • “In order for this court to review the denial of a motion to suppress, the error must be preserved by a specific and timely objection to the evidence at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Sharpnack, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.