Lycan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing Grogg v. State, 417 N.E.2d 1175 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981) with Romack v. State, 446 N.E.2d 1346 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983)
• “In order to prove that Lycan possessed the marijuana, it was not necessary to demonstrate that he was in possession at the time the marijuana was recovered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).