Skip to main content

Harper v. State

Citations

  • 445 S.E.2d 303
  • 213 Ga. App. 444
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2095
  • 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unlike jury, investigators were able to observe the defendant at the time of the robbery before his appearance had changed
  • witnesses were “able to observe the defendant at the time of the robbery before his appearance had changed”
  • pre-trial identification sufficient to support conviction, notwithstanding failure to make independent identification at trial
  • investigators were authorized to identify defendant from video because “they were able to observe the defendant at the time of the robbery before his appearance had changed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Andrews, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.