Davis v. State
Citations
- 44 Fla. 32
Syllabus
<p>Ciiminal Law—Homicide—Indictment—Expert Witnesses In Insapity—Proceedings De Lunático Inquirmdo Not Admissible On Trial Of Party To For Murder—Insanity As Defense—Order of Admittance of Evidence..</p> <p>i</p> <p>1. Under the Laws of Florida the Circuit Court of the county where the fatal blow has been struck has jurisdiction to try the homicide though the death may occur in another county or State.</p> <p>2. The proceedings and judgment of the County Judge’s Court adjudging a party insane under the provisions of Chapter 4ggl^ Laws of 1895, are not admissible in evidence upon the trial of a criminal charge against the party therein adjudged to be insane, where insanity is relied upon as a defense to such charge.</p> <p>3. It is the province of the trial court to determine whether or not a witness offered as an expert has such qualifications and special knowledge as to make his opihion in answer to hypothetical questions admissible, and the decision of such trial judge is conclusive upon the question, unless it appears from the evidence to have been 'erroneous, or to have been founded upon some error in law. The qualifications necessary to enable witnesses to give expert or opinion evidence are prescribed as well as ascertained by rules of law, and if these rules are violated by the trial judge his action is subject to review by the appellate court.</p> <p>4. The rule laid down in McNaghten’s case, 10 Clark & Fin. text, p. 209-211, as to insanity as a defense to crime, adopted and approved. The phase of insanity commonly known as the “irresistible impulse” doctrine is not recognized in Florida, and a charge announcing such doctrine to be a defense in homicide here is erroneous, hut is not reversible error in this case, as it tended to favor the accused and not to prejudice him.</p> <p>5. Sanity being the normal condition of man, when charged with crime, he is presumed to be sane, and the mere fact of the commission of the crime is not in itself sufficient to overc
Cited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EganSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-12-12· cited 140×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 120×
- Parkin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-13· cited 63×
- Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. Boyd v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-02-16· cited 43×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 42×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-11-13· cited 39×
- Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-20· cited 36×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-03-28· cited 35×
- Myers v. KorblyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-04-23· cited 33×
- Brock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-01-05· cited 28×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 27×
- Starke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-01-15· cited 27×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-06· cited 25×
- Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-02-04· cited 25×
- Reid v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-07-22· cited 23×
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-08-14· cited 20×
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1925-01-10· cited 20×
- Seaboard Air Line RR Co. v. Lake Region Packing Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-05-29· cited 19×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 19×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 59×
- State v. PagelsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1887-04-15· cited 57×
- Cunningham v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1879-01-15· cited 54×
- People v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals· 1893-06-06· cited 50×
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 39×
- Perkins v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1882-01-30· cited 39×
- People v. HoinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-11-17· cited 38×
- Abbott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1900-02-20· cited 36×
- People v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-02-17· cited 35×
- Wilcox v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1894-11-12· cited 26×
- McEwen v. BigelowMichigan Supreme Court· 1879-01-20· cited 23×
- Copeland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-01-15· cited 19×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1889-08-05· cited 16×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1892-10-04· cited 15×
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1876-10-15· cited 14×
- Ford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1896-03-15· cited 13×
- Burgo v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1889-05-31· cited 11×
- Garcia v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 10×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 10×
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1890-06-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.