Armstrong v. State
Citations
- 30 Fla. 170
Syllabus
<p>1. Where the defense of insanity is relied upon, the rule in force in this State, is, that if the evidence introduced tends to rebut the presumption of sanity on the part of the accused, and the jury entertain a reasonable doubt, after due consideration of all the evidence, as to his sanity, it is their duty to acquit.</p> <p>2. The statutory definition of murder, “ che unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect the death of the person killed,” includes the element of a rational agency, and it devolves upon the State to show this as well as any other element of the crime. The law, however, presumes that all men are sane, and in the absence of evidence indicating a contrary state of mind, both court and jury are justified in acting upon this presumption ; and where the evidence establishes the criminal act, and indicates nothing as to the mental capacity of the accused to commit the deed, a conviction is not only authorized, but should be had. If however, there arises from the evidence, coming from any quarter, a reasonable doubt as to the sanity of the accused, the presumption of the law is overcome and he is entitled to an acquittal, unless the State meets and overcomes this reasonable doubt arising in his favor.</p> <p>•3. Non-expert, witnesses can not express a general opinion as to sanity nor can they give an opinion independent of the facts and circumstances within their own knowledge ; but they can detail the facts known to them which show insanity, and thereupon express an opinion as to the sanity of the person whose mental condition is being investigated. The value of such testimony will depend largely upon the opportunities of the witnesses for correct observation of the appearances and conduct of the person whose mind is claimed to be unsound, as well as the character of such appearances and conduct.</p> <p>4. Where insanity of a permanent type, or of a continuing nature, or possessed of the characteristics
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 68×
- In Re KellySupreme Court of Florida· 1970-06-17· cited 67×
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 62×
- Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-03-24· cited 60×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-02-17· cited 55×
- State of Oregon v. GarverOregon Supreme Court· 1950-12-19· cited 49×
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-01-09· cited 49×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 42×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-11-13· cited 39×
- McVeigh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-06-25· cited 32×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 30×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 1904-04-04· cited 27×
- Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-02-04· cited 25×
- Hixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-06-17· cited 22×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 22×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 19×
- Britts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1947-05-02· cited 18×
- Flanders v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1916-03-20· cited 17×
- Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-09-10· cited 15×
- Leaptrot v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 13×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LathropSupreme Court· 1884-05-05· cited 120×
- Schultz v. Pacific InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida· 1872-01-15· cited 52×
- State v. LoweSupreme Court of Missouri· 1887-10-15· cited 43×
- Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1890-01-15· cited 39×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 35×
- Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1883-10-20· cited 24×
- Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida· 1887-06-15· cited 20×
- State v. WilnerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1876-08-15· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Nave v. NewlinIndiana Supreme Court· 1879-11-15· cited 16×
- Wood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1881-04-15· cited 13×
- Meinhard, Bros. v. LilienthalSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 7×
- Small v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 7×
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.