Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the claim that the death penalty is basically cruel and unusual punishment is without merit
• finding a similar claim to be procedurally barred because PET scan technology—even if less advanced—has been reported in cases as early as 1992
• affirming the trial court's ruling that the defendant's request for a PET-scan (1) was procedurally barred because it could have been raised in an earlier postconviction motion; (2) was speculative because it was unsupported; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-02-14· cited 73×
• Provenzano v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-24· cited 41×
• Bottoson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-31· cited 15×
• Duane Eugene Owen v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2023-06-05

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-10-04· cited 93×
• Davis v. Singletary
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-08-11· cited 89×
• Zeigler v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-11-04· cited 33×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-20· cited 31×
• Buenoano v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-20· cited 22×
• Provenzano v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-01· cited 18×
• Davis v. Singletary
  M.D. Florida· 1994-05-25· cited 10×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-03· cited 10×
• People v. Weinstein
  New York Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 7×
• Hoskins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-13· cited 5×
• Stano v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 4×