Skip to main content

Bottoson v. State

Citations

  • 813 So. 2d 31
  • 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of the defendant’s motion for SPECT/PET scan because the defendant “failed to relate the need for this testing to any substantive claim he has made in his motion for postconviction relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.