Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 180 S.W.3d 277
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9720
  • 2005 WL 3093388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the better practice would be to provide several similar voices in the 37 identification procedure”
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s motion to suppress witness’s identification of appellant’s voice even though only his voice was played for witness during the investigation
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s motion to suppress witness’s identification of appellant’s voice even though only his voice was played for witness during the investigation
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s motion to suppress witness’s identification of appellant’s voice even though only his voice was played for witness during the investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, Ross, Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.