Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 568 So. 2d 277
  • 1990 WL 146543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judges are not required to grant repetitious instructions
  • holding that judges are not required to grant repetitious instructions
  • not reversible error to reject model jury instruction, where instruction was repetitious of other instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Prather and Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.