Lamarcus Jones v. State of Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant may not use his reply brief to make new arguments on appeal. A reply brief is not an avenue to correct the deficiencies contained in the original brief.” (citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted)
• “Defendant may not use his reply brief to make - 10 - IN RE: G.C.C. Opinion of the Court new arguments on appeal. A reply brief is not an avenue to correct the deficiencies contained in the original brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).