Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 645 So. 2d 921
  • 1994 WL 646460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidentiary ruling must have resulted in denial of substantial right of defendant in order to be grounds for reversal
  • Under rule prohibiting proof of specific instances of conduct by extrinsic evidence for impeachment purposes State could have impeached alibi witness only by questioning him on cross-examination
  • Under rule prohibiting proof of specific instances of conduct by extrinsic evidence for impeachment purposes State could have impeached alibi witness only by questioning him on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prather, P.J., and Sullivan and James L. Roberts, Jr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.