Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/13/2002

Davis v. New York

Citations

  • 316 F.3d 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “reliance upon conclusory statements or mere allegations is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion”
  • recognizing that “reliance upon conclusory statements or mere allegations is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion”
  • recognizing that “reliance upon conclusory statements or mere 6 allegations is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion”
  • affirming dismissal of Section 1983 action for damages against state employees in their official capacities on sovereign immunity grounds
  • dismissing claims against DOCCS and individual defendants sued in their official capacities on Eleventh Amendment grounds
  • affirming dismissal of § 1983 claims for damages against state on Eleventh Amendment grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Davis v. New York

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.