· 12/5/1995
Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford Ward
Citations
- 71 F.3d 88
- 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1168
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a pro se appellant had abandoned an issue by failing to address it in his appellate brief
- holding that issues not raised in a pro se litigant’s appellate brief are waived
- explaining that a pro se appellant abandons an issue not raised in his appellate brief
- holding, in the context of a pro se appeal, that issues not raised in an appellate brief are abandoned
- noting that “pro se litigants should anticipate that this court may dismiss an appeal where the brief submitted contains no identifiable argument”
- explaining that a pro se appellant abandons issues not raised in his appellate brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Altimari, McLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.