Skip to main content
· 12/5/1995

Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford Ward

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 88
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1168
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a pro se appellant had abandoned an issue by failing to address it in his appellate brief
  • holding that issues not raised in a pro se litigant’s appellate brief are waived
  • explaining that a pro se appellant abandons an issue not raised in his appellate brief
  • holding, in the context of a pro se appeal, that issues not raised in an appellate brief are abandoned
  • noting that “pro se litigants should anticipate that this court may dismiss an appeal where the brief submitted contains no identifiable argument”
  • explaining that a pro se appellant abandons issues not raised in his appellate brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Altimari, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.