Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/16/2012
Davis v. Davis
Citations
- 230 Ariz. 333
- 284 P.3d 23
- 641 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21
- 2012 WL 3525333
- 2012 Ariz. App. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellant “waived . . . claim on appeal by failing to elaborate on his argument or support it with citation to legal authority”
- recognizing disagreement and collecting cases
- \The disagreement [over the meaning of consent] stems from whether implied consent satisfies the requirements of subsection (c)(4)(C).\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orozco, Thompson, Thumma
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-05-18· cited 172×
- Frank R. v. Mother Goose AdoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- BROADBENT v. BROADBENTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-02-14· cited 4×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-02-12· cited 4×
- In re Marriage of RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-07-09· cited 1×
- Rubiela Williams v. Ennis WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-05-04
- Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-03-21
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,640×
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 516×
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-08-05· cited 120×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-10· cited 106×
- Kline v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-21· cited 76×
- In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 62×
- Gowins v. GowinsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-04-11· cited 49×
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-18· cited 47×
- Bohreer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-16· cited 42×
- Northern Propane Gas Co. v. KippsArizona Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 38×
- Engle Bros. v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-04-03· cited 34×
- Seeley v. SeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-04-03· cited 28×
- In Re the Marriage of ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-09· cited 26×
- Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 23×
- Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. RomleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-01-27· cited 20×
- In Re Marriage of JacobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-10-31· cited 17×
- Allen v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-03-05· cited 16×
- In RE MARRIAGE OF KILDEA v. KildeaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-01-13· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.