Engle Bros. v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that A.R.S. § 12–501 “does not apply to a non-resident defendant who is amenable to process under the long-arm statute” (citations omitted)
• special action relief appropriate when trial court erroneously denied motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations
• special action relief appropriate when trial court erroneously denied motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations
• action brought on behalf of minor children did not toll the statute of limitation
• action brought on behalf of minor children did not toll the statute of limitations
• “[W]hen the face of the complaint reflect[s] that the claim [is] barred by the statute of limitations, the burden of proving the statute was tolled devolve[s] upon the respondent real parties in interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).