Northern Propane Gas Co. v. Kipps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• skipping the first step and analyzing jurisdiction solely in terms of minimum contacts
• re-jecting the plaintiffs’ argument that Arizona courts could exercise jurisdiction over a foreign defendant because the defendant’s employee knew that the plaintiffs would take a motor home to Arizona
• Arizona lacked jurisdiction over Michigan company that had filled propane tanks it knew were destined for Arizona
• “[T]he proper procedure for appellate review of a motion to dismiss is through a petition for special action.”
• “[T]he proper procedure for appellate review of a motion to dismiss is through a petition for special action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).