Skip to main content
· 6/9/1987

In Re the Marriage of Parks

Citations

  • 737 P.2d 1316
  • 48 Wash. App. 166
  • 1987 Wash. App. LEXIS 3776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a motion under rule 60(b) is “ancillary to or a continuation of the original suit” and so long as the Court had jurisdiction originally, jurisdiction continues for purposes of rule 60(b)
  • “By not objecting to the court’s jurisdiction . . . [appellant] consented to [i.e., lost right to contest] the court’s jurisdiction over him” at time of original decree
  • \By not objecting to the court's jurisdiction and by seeking the relief he did\ the appellant \consented to the court's jurisdiction\ and thereby waived the right to challenge jurisdiction
  • seeking affirmative relief in original dissolution proceeding constitutes implied consent
  • seeking affirmative relief in original dissolution proceeding constitutes implied consent
  • seeking affirmative relief in original dissolution proceeding constitutes implied consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petrich, Alexander, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.