Veterans Claims· 12/22/1994

Davis v. Brown

Citations

7 Vet. App. 298
1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1034
1994 WL 711255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying the presumption of regularity to the BVA’s mailing of a copy of a BVA decision to a veteran
applying the presumption of regularity to the Board's mailing of a copy of its decision to a veteran
applying the presumption of regularity to the Board's mailing of a copy of its decision to a veteran
there exists presumption that appellant was notified of BVA decision and that presumption can be overcome only by “ ‘clear evidence to the contrary’ ”
there exists presumption that appellant was notified of BVA decision and that presumption can be overcome only by \'clear evidence to the contrary'\ (quoting Ashley v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 307, 308-09 (1992)
“[T]he phrase ‘the B[oard] shall promptly mail’ in [section] 7104(e) means that the B[oard] decision must be correctly addressed, stamped with the proper postage, and delivered directly by the B[oard] into the custody of the U.S. Postal Service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Kramer, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.