Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 6/12/1995

East v. Brown

Citations

  • 8 Vet. App. 34
  • 1995 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 468
  • 1995 WL 351052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a \clearly erroneous\ standard
  • determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a “clearly erroneous” standard
  • proper notice turns on propriety of procedures used, not subjective lack of knowledge of property owner
  • “Since the appellant’s only challenge to the validity of the loan guaranty indebtedness is his allegation of inadequate notice, the Court holds that the loan guaranty is valid”
  • notice procedures used must meet the “objective propriety” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Ivers, Kramer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.