McArthur Jones, Claimant-Appellant, and Martin M. Karnas, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \differences in judicial interpretation of a statute\ do not prove \the statute's ambiguity\
• holding that \differences in judicial inter- pretation of a statute\ do not prove \the statute’s ambiguity\
• holding that because the statutory phrase \case pending\ in section 506 of the Federal Court's Administration Act of 1992 made no distinction between the fee application stage of a case and consideration of the case on the merits, the court would likewise make no distinction
• Federal Circuit relying upon Black’s Law Dictionary for the definitions of “case” and “appeal”
• order granting motion to summarily vacate Court’s February 18, 1994, judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).