Orland R. Marsh v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there is a presumption “that public officers perform their duties “ ‘correctly, fairly, in good faith, and in accordance with law and governing regulations” ’ ” (quoting Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Johnson, 8 F.3d 791, 795 (Fed.Cir.1993))
• applying the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review to Board's adverse finding with regard to whether an NOD had been timely filed
• applying the “clearly erroneous” standard of review to Board’s adverse finding with regard to whether an NOD had been timely filed
• relying on VA regulations to establish VA procedures for issuing SOCs
• the Court determines on a de novo basis whether the presumption of regularity attaches
• the Court determines on a de novo basis whether the presumption of regularity attaches

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).