David Pannell v. Daniel R. McBride Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]risoners do not have the right to call witnesses whose testimony would be irrelevant, repetitive, or unnecessary.”
• “[P]risoners do not have the right to call witnesses whose testimony would be irrelevant, repetitive, or unnecessary.”
• “[P]risoners do not have the right to call witnesses whose testimony would be irrelevant, repetitive, or unnecessary.”
• prejudice shown when inmate said two corrections officers would have testified that during a search they saw another officer open a package that the inmate allegedly opened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).