Skip to main content
· 5/7/2007

Aaron B. Scruggs v. D. Bruce Jordan

Citations

  • 485 F.3d 934
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10790
  • 2007 WL 1309416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “prison disciplinary officials need not permit the presentation of irrelevant or repetitive evidence in order to afford prisoners due process in disciplinary proceedings.”
  • “[P]rison disciplinary officials need not permit the presentation of irrelevant *** evidence in order to afford prisoners due process in disciplinary proceedings.”
  • formal, adversarial process of Wolff required for inmate subjected to loss of good time as well as segregation
  • no right to call live witnesses or view surveillance video
  • \Prisoners do maintain due process rights.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.