Clyde Piggie v. Daniel McBride Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a request for evidence is timely if it is made \either before or at the hearing\
• noting that prison officials \may not arbitrarily refuse to consider exculpatory evidence simply because other evidence in the record suggests guilt\ (internal quotations omitted)
• observing that prison disciplinary boards are not “courts for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)”
• acknowledging that, if the petitioner failed to request video evidence “either before or at the hearing, then the [respondents] could not have denied him due process by not considering the request”
• a request is timely if it is made \either before or at the hearing.\
• “We agree that if [an inmate] fails to make such a request either before or at the hearing, then the [disciplinary committee] could not have denied him due process by not considering the request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).