Tony Love v. Frank Vanihel

Oral argument

• Argued

  27 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that former inmate’s claims against state entities—the DOC and Phelps Correctional Center—and state employees in their official capacities were barred by the Eleventh Amendment
• explaining that this court “generously interpret[s] the scope of the appeal”
• PLRA applies when inmate is incarcerated at the time he files suit, even if he was released during pendency of suit
• PLRA applies when inmate is incarcerated at the time he files suit, even if he was released during pendency of suit
• PLRA applies when inmate is incarcerated at the time he files suit, even if he was released during pendency of suit
• PLRA applies when inmate incarcerated at time he files suit, even if released during pendency of suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).