Skip to main content

Kaplan v. Kaplan

Citations

  • 185 Conn. 42
  • 440 A.2d 252
  • 1981 Conn. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • articulation necessary where trial court denied motion without providing any oral or written basis for decision
  • “the principal issue before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion by not ordering a modification of alimony under the so-called ‘cohabitation’ statute, § 46b-86 [b]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogdanski, Speziale, Peters, Parskey, Armentano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.