Boreen v. Boreen
Citations
- 192 Conn. App. 303
Syllabus
The plaintiff, whose marriage to the defendant previously had been dis- solved, appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant's motion to terminate alimony, to determine overpayments and to set a repayment schedule. The trial court found that the plaintiff was living with R, her boyfriend, within the meaning of the applicable statute (§ 46b-86 [b]), and, therefore, that the defendant's alimony obligation terminated under the terms of the parties' separation agreement, which had been incorporated into the dissolution judgment and provided that the defendant's alimony obligation would terminate on the date the court determined that the plaintiff commenced ''living with another person.'' Held: 1. The trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff was ''living with another person'' for purposes of § 46b-86 (b): although the plaintiff claimed that she and R maintained separate residences and were together less than all of the time, ample evidence supported the court's finding that the plaintiff was living with R, including evidence that the couple resided under the same roof for approximately half the week, took many meals together, regularly communicated by cell phone, and frequently traveled together, and that R provided for the plaintiff's health insurance coverage under his own policy as a result of the couple holding themselves out as being in a domestic partnership, and allowed the plaintiff to keep a rent-free art studio in his home, and even though the plaintiff and R maintained separate homes and did not sleep in the same residence every night, the plaintiff's living arrangements changed such that she no longer needed the same financial support as at the time of the original alimony order; moreover, the court properly relied on the fact that R provided the plaintiff with health insurance coverage in concluding that the plaintiff was living with him, as the plaintiff and R held themselves out as a couple who were in a n
Judges: DiPentima; Alvord; Diana
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.