Skip to main content
· 11/12/2002

Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George Stephanopoulos

Citations

  • 310 F.3d 1118
  • 31 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1434
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12845
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11079
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23371
  • 2002 WL 31500990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that federal courts applying state law must apply the forum state's borrowing statute in determining which state's statute of limitations governs
  • holding that “harsh 5 name-calling” such as “‘trash,’ ‘crap’ and ‘garbage’” was not defamatory
  • stating that a showing of actual malice is 6 required to prevail on a false light claim
  • finding the plaintiff’s cause of action for a defamation claim accrued upon the occurrence of the tortious act
  • noting this court will “affirm dismissal of the false light claims where we have affirmed dismissal of the parallel defamation claims”
  • finding a defamation claim was sufficiently plead when plaintiff “list[ed] the precise 4 statements alleged to be false and defamatory, who made them and when.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Kozinski, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.