Skip to main content

Darcy v. Lolohea

Citations

  • 886 P.2d 759
  • 77 Haw. 422
  • 1994 Haw. App. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We hold that an arbitration award which has become a final judgment pursuant to HAR Rule 21, may not be vacated or modified by the circuit court, or appealed to an appellate eourt[.]”
  • court review of arbitration award limited by provisions of arbitration statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Darcy v. Lolohea

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.