Parker v. Nakaoka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Mjeeting the threshold requirement is an essential condition and element of [a plaintiffs] cause of action.”
• whether plaintiff has met No-Fault threshold requirement of significant permanent loss is for jury to determine if facts relating to injury are in dispute and reasonable minds could differ on result
• “When the evidence is so clear that reasonable minds could only come to one conclusion, it is not error for the trial judge to remove the ... question from the jury and to determine the question as a matter of law.”
• “When the evidence is so clear that reasonable minds could only come to one conclusion, it is not error for the trial judge to remove the ... question from the jury and to determine the question as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).