Second Circuit· 4/19/1996
Danneskjold v. Hausrath
Citations
- 82 F.3d 37
- 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 357
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that unfair-competition concerns may exist when a prisoner is paid below minimum wage to work for a private company that does not perform prison services
- noting “a congressional assumption that prison labor will not be paid at FLSA minimum wage level”
- “[T]he continued existence of the Ashurst-Summers [sic] Act . . . reveals a congressional assumption that prison labor will not be paid at FLSA minimum wage levels.”
- “[T]he Ashurst-Summers [sic] Act . . . regulates the interstate transportation of prison-made goods to 18 avoid competition between low-cost prison labor and free labor . . . .” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Williams v. HenaganFifth Circuit· 2010-01-29· cited 165×
- Allen v. CuomoSecond Circuit· 1996-11-07· cited 87×
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.S.D. New York· 2003-01-28· cited 58×
- William Burrell, Jr. v. Tom StaffThird Circuit· 2023-02-08· cited 29×
- Lopez v. SilvermanS.D. New York· 1998-07-23· cited 20×
- Gambetta v. Prison Rehabilitative Industries & Diversified Enterprises, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1997-05-15· cited 17×
- Foley v. Mobil Chemical Co.New York Supreme Court· 1996-05-31· cited 14×
- Jeong Woo Kim v. 511 E. 5th Street, LLCS.D. New York· 2015-09-30· cited 12×
- Kounelis v. SherrerD. New Jersey· 2005-10-20· cited 11×
- Michael Scott v. Baltimore County, MarylandFourth Circuit· 2024-05-08· cited 5×
- David Gamble v. Minnesota State-Operated SvcsEighth Circuit· 2022-04-26· cited 3×
- Loving v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2006-07-28
- Villarreal v. WoodhamEleventh Circuit· 1997-05-29
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court· 1985-04-15· cited 1,304×
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,143×
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-04-24· cited 480×
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeSecond Circuit· 1984-05-14· cited 401×
- Donald Gene Henthorn v. Department of NavyD.C. Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 213×
- Hale v. ArizonaNinth Circuit· 1993-05-04· cited 201×
- Daniel Lee Vanskike v. Howard A. Peters, IIISeventh Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 167×
- Kevin Watson and Raymond Wayne Thrash v. Odom Graves, Darryl Jarreau, Marilyn Jarreau, and Abe RossFifth Circuit· 1990-09-13· cited 148×
- Celia Henry v. Daytop Village, Inc.Second Circuit· 1994-12-01· cited 127×
- Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare AgencyNinth Circuit· 1983-05-05· cited 102×
- Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.E.D. Michigan· 1971-01-05· cited 73×
- Ellis v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-02-22· cited 36×
- Robert Wentworth, on Behalf of Himself and All Others So Confined v. Herman Solem, Acting Warden, South Dakota State PenitentiaryEighth Circuit· 1977-02-08· cited 30×
- McMaster v. MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 1994-07-25· cited 30×
- Harker v. State Use IndustriesSupreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 27×
- Danneskjold v. HausrathSecond Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 27×
- Hudgins v. HartE.D. Louisiana· 1971-03-18· cited 22×
- Huntley v. Gunn Furniture Co.W.D. Michigan· 1948-07-13· cited 22×
- Reimonenq v. FotiFifth Circuit· 1996-01-11· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.