E.D. Michigan· 1/5/1971
Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.
Citations
- 334 F. Supp. 774
- 20 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “plaintiffs are not in economic reality employees of defendant drug companies as that word is defined in the Act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ralph M. Freeman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeSecond Circuit· 1984-05-14· cited 401×
- Daniel Lee Vanskike v. Howard A. Peters, IIISeventh Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 167×
- LaChapelle v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1975-05-23· cited 166×
- Kevin Watson and Raymond Wayne Thrash v. Odom Graves, Darryl Jarreau, Marilyn Jarreau, and Abe RossFifth Circuit· 1990-09-13· cited 148×
- Marie Wilcox, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. Commerce Bank of Kansas City, a Corporation, Appellee-DefendantTenth Circuit· 1973-03-19· cited 101×
- Pritchard v. Dent Wizard International Corp.S.D. Ohio· 2002-08-06· cited 97×
- Zine v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-01· cited 86×
- Schmidt v. Fuller Brush Co.Eighth Circuit· 1975-12-22· cited 60×
- American Finance System Inc. v. HarlowD. Maryland· 1974-10-17· cited 59×
- Cumbey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1985-05-07· cited 53×
- Olivo v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2004-04-01· cited 49×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1993-05-04· cited 47×
- George Alexander v. Sara, Incorporated and Dr. Harry L. ShaheenFifth Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 45×
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.D. Delaware· 1974-08-13· cited 44×
- Rodríguez Rosado v. Syntex (F.P.), Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-09-30· cited 37×
- Nguyen Da Yen v. KissingerN.D. California· 1976-03-12· cited 34×
- Moreno v. University of MarylandD. Maryland· 1976-07-13· cited 30×
- Tuma v. American Can CompanyD. New Jersey· 1973-04-26· cited 27×
- Danneskjold v. HausrathSecond Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 27×
- Amos v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1987-10-14· cited 21×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court· 1933-04-17· cited 808×
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court· 1947-06-16· cited 647×
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-04-24· cited 480×
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-04· cited 361×
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court· 1948-05-17· cited 280×
- Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court· 1950-05-15· cited 250×
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-01-23· cited 207×
- Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 1963-02-28· cited 68×
- Maurice Sigler v. Vincent R. LowrieEighth Circuit· 1969-01-08· cited 63×
- Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationD. Minnesota· 1967-11-01· cited 56×
- Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 56×
- The American Securit Company, a Corporation v. Hamilton Glass Company, Inc., a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1958-04-24· cited 51×
- Fidelis Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.S.D. New York· 1968-09-24· cited 47×
- George C. Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Company, George C. Matthies v. Earl B. Boies, (Two Cases)Second Circuit· 1959-09-09· cited 44×
- Goodchild v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court· 1965-04-09· cited 42×
- Walling v. SandersSixth Circuit· 1943-06-03· cited 35×
- Henry Hughes v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1959-06-29· cited 32×
- Creel v. Lone Star Defense CorporationFifth Circuit· 1949-01-18· cited 24×
- Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Co.D. Connecticut· 1958-12-09· cited 23×
Other cases named Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.