Celia Henry v. Daytop Village, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing this Rule to mean that “a plaintiff may plead two or more statements of a claim, even within the same count, regardless of consistency,” and permitting the inconsistency to “lie either in the statement of the facts or in the legal theories adopted” (citation omitted)
• “[E]ven if [plaintiff]’s claims were somehow inconsistent . . . we could and would entertain them both.”
• “[A] plaintiff may plead two or more statements of a claim, even within the same count, regardless of consistency.”
• “Evidence that [a] reason is false ... is central to establishing pretext .... ”
• “The flexibility afforded by Rule 8(e)(2) is especially appropriate in civil rights cases, in which complex inquiries into the parties' intent may sometimes justify raising multiple, inconsistent claims.”
• “The flexibility afforded by Rule 8(e)(2) is especially appropriate in civil rights cases, in which complex inquiries into the parties’ intent may sometimes justify raising multiple, inconsistent claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).