Skip to main content
· 5/6/2014

Daniel Uballe v. State

Citations

  • 439 S.W.3d 380
  • 2014 WL 1829849
  • 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 4874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that the Texas Constitution provides greater protection against unreasonable searches and seizures than the United States Constitution and declining to apply the Autran plurality opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Campbell, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.