Skip to main content
· 1/14/2008

Dangerfield v. State

Citations

  • 656 S.E.2d 352
  • 376 S.C. 176
  • 2008 S.C. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the imposition of a suspended sentence deprived the defendant of a conditional liberty interest and implicated the defendants due process rights
  • holding that due process required notice and a hearing on the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay restitution before imposition of a suspended sentence
  • including “the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses” as one of the requirements of “[t]he procedural component of the state and federal due process clauses”
  • applying federal due process law to claims under both the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 3 of the South Carolina constitution
  • \Due process considerations apply in contested cases or hearings which affect an individual's property or liberty interests as contemplated by the federal and state constitutions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.