D'amore v. Small Business Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nor does [appellant’s] status as a privately owned but government regulated monopoly preclude its assertion of First Amendment rights.”
• even if state has compelling interest in protecting recipients of objectionable mail, state could simply require sender to stop mailing to people who object
• restriction is content-based if it “prohibit[s] [] public discussion of an entire topic” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).