Williams v. Hayman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for summary judgment when the only interpreter provided was a “primarily self-taught” employee (cleaned up)
• “[C]ompensatory damages are available to plaintiffs asserting claims under Title II of the ADA, but only where it is shown that the discrimination was intentional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).