Skip to main content
· 4/11/2006

Ehrman v. United States

Citations

  • 429 F. Supp. 2d 61
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17962
  • 2006 WL 931559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to the FSGB after finding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious
  • describing an FSGB decision as “den[ing] [Plaintiff’s] request for interim relief, reasoning that he would suffer no irreparable harm from separation and that there was little likelihood that he would prevail on the merits of the appeal”
  • “When both parties in a cause of action move for summary judgment, each party must carry its own burden.”
  • “When both parties in a cause of action move for summary judgment, each party must carry its own burden.”
  • “When both parties in a cause of action move for summary judgment, each party must carry its own burden.”
  • “Although the FSGB’s Decision thoroughly summarized the parties’ positions, its findings reflect a selective reliance on the Department’s conclusory statements in the administrative record .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.